Virgin Womb of Theotokoi
There's something about Mary . . .
How are Christians to understand the mother of the Messiah? On the one hand, there is the Roman Catholic view complete with a doctrine of immaculate conception and pushing the boundaries of 2000 years of the church's articulation of how God's salvation works. On the other hand, there is a Protestant backlash that wants to ignore her completely except to cast a young lady for her character in the annual Christmas pageant.
Are modern minds expected to buy into concepts like an immaculate conception or even a virgin birth? I admit that through my training in various hermeneutics of criticism that I could give or take the doctrine of the virgin birth. I see no reason Jesus couldn't be the Messiah if Joseph and Mary got it on prior to their marriage. Yet I also see no reason to reject 2000 years of tradition out right just to satisfy the limited minds of modernity.
So what are we to do about Mary? Continuing along the lines of the previous article about birthing church leaders, I'd like to suggest that we understand Mary as a model for the church. (This isn't my idea; it is an ancient patristic theme.) If the church is the womb from which leaders for discipleship are born, then make no mistake about it, that womb is of a virgin.
There's a lot of people and a lot of literature out there that want the church to get in bed with the powers of the world in order to train leaders. They say that if the church could just be more like Starbucks, Google, the U.S. Miliatry, Disney and so on, then we'd see a re-energized church with a growing membership and influence in our society. That may be true. But it may also forfeit our identity as church in the process. Now, I'm not saying we can't learn from various leadership models in our society. I am saying that we can do so without prostituting the church's identity granted her in the marriage covenant with God. We can learn from our culture without inviting it into our bed.
We need to pay less attention to how Donald Trump determines the winner of the next "Apprentice", and pay more attention to the story of God's work of salvation through Jesus. The good news of his life, death, resurrection, and ascension forms our identity. To paraphrase St. Ireneaus, Jesus sanctifies our birth and abolishes our death. Through baptism God invites us to participate in this story, to be characters in its plot.
We were conceived as Jesus' disciples in our baptism. And like his, ours was a virginal conception consumated by God's presence in the womb. Holy Spirit calls, gathers, and empowers people into discipleship. The church shares the same role in birthing disciples as Mary did in birthing our Messiah. We are theotokoi -- God-bearers.
The irony concerning Jesus' virgin birth is that modern minds interpret the doctrine as a lame attempt to assert Jesus' divinity, yet Ireneaus insisted on this doctrine as a way to prove Jesus's humanity, his creatureliness and worldliness, against gnostic heresy. In the thesis "On Apostolic Preaching" Ireneaus writes, "if one does not accept His birth from a Virgin, how can he accept His resurrection from the dead? . . . if He was not born, neither did He die; and if He did not die, neither was He raised from the dead; and if He was not raised from the dead, death is not conquered nor its kingdom destroyed; and if death is not conquered, how are we to ascend to life, having fallen under death from the beginning?" (John Behr's translation. Crestwood, New York: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1997. pp 64-65.)
This same ironic twist concerning Jesus' virgin birth has also defiled our understanding of baptism and our expectations for receiving new adult disciples into a congregation. We assert God's role to the point that we forget divine grace works through human creatureliness participating in Jesus' story for the sake of the world. Certainly, disciples are born of a virgin's womb, but the church's role in birthing leaders is not passive. We are active theotokoi. If we neglect our call to form communities of radical discipleship, then the church will be marginalized in the world the same way Protestantism has relegated Mary to her once-yearly token pageant appearance.
Therefore, we must ask ourselves what our congregations would look like if we took Jesus' story with the utmost seriousness for our lives. Leadership of theotokoi looks a lot different than any model of leadership known to the world. We know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. But it is not so among us. Theotokoi leadership is humane yet not of humanity. It is a creaturely leadership yet not of creation. It is worldly yet not of the world. It is for us, but not of our standards, credentials, or expectations. Rather when Holy Spirit calls, gathers, and empowers us in the virgin womb of the church, we join with Mary in witnessing God's saving activity in our world:
1 comment:
Since you are at a place of Roman Catholicism, and since you represent the nominal Lutherans at campus, it was only a matter of time, Kevan, before Mary would figure greatly into your conceptions of the church.
I like the images you have lifted up for us. The church is like Mary and gives birth to little Christs. It gestates them in its catechesis and provides them with the Eucharist, God's holy milk for nursing children of God. It washes them clean in the bath of baptism like a mother scrubs behind her daughter's ears after a long day of play. It sings bedtime songs and teaches us how to walk and be strong in the faith.
But I am uneasy with thinking that the church can be theotokoi. I'm uneasy with it because I've seen the nastiness of the church, the laziness of the church, and how the church switches the gospel of Jesus the Nazarene who ushers in the reign of God for other gospels and false teachings. How could God choose us? With that I am uneasy, and I perhaps always will be.
But the fact remains...God has chosen us to usher in God's reign. And God has chosen to place light within us so that when people see our good works they would glorify God in heaven. This light points the way in the darkness. It doesn't absolve our darkness, but does show us a way through our darkness.
I still wonder about God's wisdom for this method. Either God is extremely foolish, or God is up to something beyond my limited, finite understanding. Or perhaps God is both foolish and up to something beyond me.
This draws me closer to God's sovereignty as our final Judge in life. In the Messiah do I place my trust. I'd bet my life and my death on him. And, in moments of wonder at just what in the world God is up to, then I place my trust further upon God.
Bill Easum has lifted up the role of church leaders as one that mimics midwives. We are called to be spiritual midwives giving birht to disciples of the risen Messiah who discern God's call of where God wants us to join his coming reign. You can read his thoughts further at http://easumbandy.com/resources/index.php?action=details&record=306
(You may have to cut and paste that into your browser for now.)
Thanks for the challenging thoughts Kevan!
Paul (saxophone, Q Source lives!)
Post a Comment